ArticleHeliyon2024
Deciphering angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) inhibition dynamics: Carnosine's modulatory role in breast cancer proliferation - A clinical sciences perspective.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential medical applicability of N-β-Ala and N-His dipeptidomimetics against breast cancer: short in vitro and in silico screening.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Synthesis, molecular docking, andRSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a pivotal molecular nexus linking novel coronavirus disease to breast cancer. In-silico investigations have repurposed carnosine for both these conditions based on its potential ACE2 inhibitory properties. Methods: Utilizing an ACE2 inhibitor screening kit, we determined the inhibitory range of carnosine doses. Subsequently, we examined the effect of carnosine on ACE2 expression in supernatants from various breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and EMT-6). Additionally, we compared ACE2 activity in cell line pellets with and without carnosine and a putative ACE2 activator using a fluorometric activity assay kit. Finally, we performed a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay across overlapping concentrations. Results: Carnosine exhibited dose-dependent ACE2 inhibition within the 100-300 mM range. ACE2 expression significantly diminished after exposure to carnosine for 2 and 24 h in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines, respectively. MTT assay unveiled notable antiproliferative effects in MDA-MB-231 (50 % survival at approximately 265 mM) and EMT-6 cell lines (unquantifiable 50 % survival dose). Conversely, the MCF-7 cell line displayed a modest increase in proliferation (Effective concentration 50-186 mM, ∼40 % increased survival). Conclusion: This pioneering study delineates evident dose-dependent ACE2 inhibition by carnosine. Moreover, it unveils the modulatory impact of this ACE2 inhibitor in breast cancer cell lines. Carnosine demonstrated a significant antiproliferative effect on aggressive cell lines while sparing luminal cell lines from substantial toxic or proliferative effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.