ArticleHeliyon2024
Investigating the synergistic effects of internal curing and pozzolanic activity in mortar utilizing clay-burnt brick fines.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical and transport properties of concrete incorporating recycled crushed clay bricks as coarse and fine aggregates.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the combined effect of internal curing and pozzolanic activity in mortar through the incorporation of clay-burnt brick fines (CBBF) as a partial substitute for sand. Simultaneously, the study explores the degree of pozzolanic reactivity by replacing a part of cement with finer clay-burnt brick fines (CBBP, particle size <75 μm). These materials are sourced from waste materials generated during brick-chip production. The 50 mm cubic mortar specimens were prepared by substituting a portion of fine aggregate with pre-wetted CBBF up to 20 % v/v and replacing cement with CBBP up to 27 % v/v. Two separate sand-to-cement ratios (S/C) of 1.2 and 1.6 were used in the mortar mixes. Samples underwent mechanical testing and were analyzed using ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and accelerated carbonation tests. At a S/C of 1.6, increasing CBBF content in the mortar led to higher compressive strength. Conversely, for S/C = 1.2, the optimal replacement level was 4 % v/v of CBBF, beyond which compressive strength gradually decreased due to the porous nature of CBBF particles. Moreover, an 8 % CBBF replacement demonstrated maximum resistance to carbonation. SEM analysis revealed a denser matrix, indicating the effectiveness of CBBF in enhancing mechanical and durability properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.