Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398065›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Investigating the synergistic effects of internal curing and pozzolanic activity in mortar utilizing clay-burnt brick fines.

Tarek Uddin Mohammed, Jamil Ahmed Joy, Chowdhury Zubayer Bin Zahid, Redwan Ul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tarek Uddin MohammedDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, 1704, Bangladesh.
Jamil Ahmed JoyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, 1704, Bangladesh.
Chowdhury Zubayer Bin ZahidDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, 1704, Bangladesh.
Redwan Ul IslamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur, 1704, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the combined effect of internal curing and pozzolanic activity in mortar through the incorporation of clay-burnt brick fines (CBBF) as a partial substitute for sand. Simultaneously, the study explores the degree of pozzolanic reactivity by replacing a part of cement with finer clay-burnt brick fines (CBBP, particle size <75 μm). These materials are sourced from waste materials generated during brick-chip production. The 50 mm cubic mortar specimens were prepared by substituting a portion of fine aggregate with pre-wetted CBBF up to 20 % v/v and replacing cement with CBBP up to 27 % v/v. Two separate sand-to-cement ratios (S/C) of 1.2 and 1.6 were used in the mortar mixes. Samples underwent mechanical testing and were analyzed using ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and accelerated carbonation tests. At a S/C of 1.6, increasing CBBF content in the mortar led to higher compressive strength. Conversely, for S/C = 1.2, the optimal replacement level was 4 % v/v of CBBF, beyond which compressive strength gradually decreased due to the porous nature of CBBF particles. Moreover, an 8 % CBBF replacement demonstrated maximum resistance to carbonation. SEM analysis revealed a denser matrix, indicating the effectiveness of CBBF in enhancing mechanical and durability properties.

Indexed as

CarbonationClay-burnt brick finesInternal curingMortarPozzolanic activityUPV

Identifiers

PMID39398065
PMCPMC11471270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.