ArticleHeliyon2024
Breast cancer molecular subtype classification according to immunohistochemistry markers and its association with pathological characteristics among women attending tertiary hospitals in Tanzania.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an immune-related molecular subtyping model based on a four-gene prognostic biomarker signature and multi-omics integrative analysis in Luminal B breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Endocrine Disruptors and Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer immunohistochemistry is a biological characteristic of the tumour which has a role to diagnose molecular subtype, prognosticate and guide treatment and is categorised into 4 subtypes. Data in Tanzania was lacking and was based off data extrapolated from studies in Western Africa thus hypothesizing that women of African ancestry predominately develop Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out at two tertiary referral hospitals on participants who were recruited from the cancer registries from 2015 to 2022. Prevalence of each molecular subtype was determined and association between molecular subtype to demographic and pathological characteristics were evaluated. Predictors of molecular subtypes was then determined using logistic regression. Results: Total number of participants were 1214, median age was 50 (IQR: 41-61), median tumor size was 5 cm (IQR: 4-7) with lymph node positivity in 73.7 %. Immunohistochemistry studies showed estrogen, progesterone and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) receptor positivity in 54.4 %, 34.4 % and 27.8 % of cases respectively. Molecular subtype classification prevalence for Luminal A was 21.17 % (95 % CI: 18.87-23.47), for Luminal B 35.75 % (95 % CI: 33.05-38.45), for HER2 enriched 11.86 % (95 % CI: 10.04-13.68) and for TNBC 31.22 % (95 % CI: 28.61-33.83). Significant association was seen between molecular subtype with age, tumor size, tumor grade and lymph node involvement. Predictors of Luminal tumors were larger tumor size (aOR 1.217, 95 % CI: 1.149-1.291) no lymph node involvement (aOR 0.429, 95 % CI: 0.313-0.589) while an advanced tumor grade reduced likelihood (aOR 0.041, 95 % CI: 0.011-0.019). Conclusion: In Tanzania Luminal B was most predominant subtype presenting at an earlier age and associated with more favorable pathological characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.