ArticleHeliyon2024
Enhanced classification performance using deep learning based segmentation for pulmonary embolism detection in CT angiography.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D region-growing nnU-Net improves pulmonary embolism detection on CTPA: a dual-cohort validation study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Emergency Department Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Deep Learning Framework for Pulmonary Embolism Detection in CT Angiography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review of Emerging Imaging Techniques and Intravascular Interventions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Segmentation of Gray Matter Structures on T1-Weighted Brain MRI: A Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Network, Convolutional Neural Network Hybrid-Transformer or -Mamba Architectures.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in CTPA-based pulmonary embolism detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a deep learning-based algorithm that automatically and accurately classifies patients as either having pulmonary emboli or not in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) examinations. Materials and methods: For model development, 700 CTPA examinations from 652 patients performed at a single institution were used, of which 149 examinations contained 1497 PE traced by radiologists. The nnU-Net deep learning-based segmentation framework was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. To enhance classification, we applied logical rules based on PE volume and probability thresholds. External model evaluation was performed in 770 and 34 CTPAs from two independent datasets. Results: A total of 1483 CTPA examinations were evaluated. In internal cross-validation and test set, the trained model correctly classified 123 of 128 examinations as positive for PE (sensitivity 96.1 %; 95 % C.I. 91-98 %; P < .05) and 521 of 551 as negative (specificity 94.6 %; 95 % C.I. 92-96 %; P < .05), achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 96.4 % (95 % C.I. 79-99 %; P < .05). In the first external test dataset, the trained model correctly classified 31 of 32 examinations as positive (sensitivity 96.9 %; 95 % C.I. 84-99 %; P < .05) and 2 of 2 as negative (specificity 100 %; 95 % C.I. 34-100 %; P < .05), achieving an AUROC of 98.6 % (95 % C.I. 83-100 %; P < .05). In the second external test dataset, the trained model correctly classified 379 of 385 examinations as positive (sensitivity 98.4 %; 95 % C.I. 97-99 %; P < .05) and 346 of 385 as negative (specificity 89.9 %; 95 % C.I. 86-93 %; P < .05), achieving an AUROC of 98.5 % (95 % C.I. 83-100 %; P < .05). Conclusion: Our automatic pipeline achieved beyond state-of-the-art diagnostic performance of PE in CTPA using nnU-Net for segmentation and volume- and probability-based post-processing for classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.