ArticleHeliyon2024
Study of the synergistic effect of analogical and explicit learning in beginning junior tennis players.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-12-29Plagiarism of/in Article · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor skill learning is a field where implicit and explicit synergistic learning is particularly evident in authentic situations. While current research on analogical learning, an effective method of implicit learning, is largely focused on theoretical discussions and separability studies, there are relatively few studies that combine analogical learning with explicit learning. In this study, a one-way experimental design was utilized to investigate the synergistic effect of analogical learning and explicit learning on the acquisition of forehand hitting skills in beginning tennis players. A total of thirty-nine children aged 6-8 years were randomly assigned to different groups: one group learned through analogical learning after explicit learning, another group learned through analogical learning followed by explicit learning, and the final group learned through alternating analogical and explicit learning. The performance of each group was evaluated based on retention and transfer tests, measuring batting accuracy, action scores, and number of knowledge mastery. The results showed that the group that underwent analogical learning followed by explicit learning performed better compared to the other two groups. These findings provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the learning of tennis skills of children beginners and the teaching of coaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.