ArticleHeliyon2024
Sustainability and circularity assessment of biomass-based energy supply chain.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change and other environmental consequences of socio-economic activities require a more sustainable and circular growth. At the same time, the limitation of the earth resource demands industries to improve resource efficiency and increase the rate of recycling of materials. There are several sustainable and circular alternatives that the industries may adopt. However, the question is that among these alternatives, which one should be selected for implementation for the highest sustainable and circular benefits. This study introduces a novel tool for assessing the sustainability and circularity of biomass-based energy supply chains, integrating multi-criteria decision-making methods with life cycle thinking approach. It evaluates five alternatives using a sustainability and circularity indicators, offering new insights into the deloyment of circular business models at companies in biomass-based energy supply chain. The tool is also applied to a specific rice straw supply chain in Italy, to assess the sustainability and circularity of five alternatives and outrank them. The results indicated that not all the alternatives are better in terms of supporting sustainable development and circular economy, compared to the baseline business model. In this supply chain, the extended lifetime for digestate from the aerobic digestion plant is the most 'sustainable and circular' alternative, while the capture of carbon dioxide from the same plant and its use for microalgae cultivation is the least 'sustainable and circular' alternative. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on different weighting sets during the assessment. It indicated that the priority of the decision makers can slightly change the outrank of the alternatives and the magnitude of the outranks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.