ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Predicting functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients using genetic, environmental, and clinical factors: a machine learning analysis of population-based prospective cohort study.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a prediction model for activities of daily living dysfunction among stroke survivors: insights from the CHARLS cohort.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Prediction of recurrence and functional status in young ischemic stroke patients: Comparison of machine learning and traditional statistical methods.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of adult disability that can severely compromise the quality of life for patients. Accurately predicting the IS functional outcome is crucial for precise risk stratification and effective therapeutic interventions. We developed a predictive model integrating genetic, environmental, and clinical factors using data from 7819 IS patients in the Third China National Stroke Registry. Employing an 80:20 split, we randomly divided the dataset into development and internal validation cohorts. The discrimination and calibration performance of models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for discrimination and Brier score with calibration curve in the internal validation cohort. We conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in the development cohort, identifying rs11109607 (ANKS1B) as the most significant variant associated with IS functional outcome. We employed principal component analysis to reduce dimensionality on the top 100 significant variants identified by the GWAS, incorporating them as genetic factors in the predictive model. We employed a machine learning algorithm capable of identifying nonlinear relationships to establish predictive models for IS patient functional outcome. The optimal model was the XGBoost model, which outperformed the logistic regression model (AUC 0.818 versus 0.756, P < .05) and significantly improved reclassification efficiency. Our study innovatively incorporated genetic, environmental, and clinical factors for predicting the IS functional outcome in East Asian populations, thereby offering novel insights into IS functional outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.