Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39397375›Full record

ArticleJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2026

Swirling Flow Quantification in Helical Stents Using Ultrasound Velocimetry.

Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan, Majorie van Helvert, Lennart van de Velde, Michel M P J Reijnen, Michel Versluis, Erik Groot Jebbink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh-DagheyanMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-2821
Majorie van HelvertMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6736-3322
Lennart van de VeldeMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8804-8671
Michel M P J ReijnenMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Michel VersluisPhysics of Fluids, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-1860
Erik Groot JebbinkMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-8603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHelical stents have been developed to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), with the premise that their particular geometry could promote swirling flow in the blood. The aim of this work is to provide evidence on the existence of this swirling flow by quantifying its signatures. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study consists of in vitro and in vivo parts. For the in vitro part, 3 helical stent models of different helicity degrees and 1 straight model were fabricated, and the flow was assessed at the inlet and outlet of each model. For the in vivo part, only 1 patient, treated with the helical stent, was eligible to participate in the study. The stent implanted in the SFA of the patient was evaluated in 2 leg postures (straight and flexed), and flow was assessed in 12 locations along the SFA. The in vivo study was approved by an ethical board (NL80130.091.21) in the Netherlands. High-frame-rate ultrasound was used to acquire data from the regions of interest (ROIs), using microbubbles as contrast agents. After processing the data via a correlation-based algorithm (echo particle image velocimetry or echoPIV), the velocity vector field within each ROI was extracted and analyzed for parameters such as vector complexity and velocity profile skewedness.

resultsThe results show that in the outlet of the helical stents, when compared with the inlet, the flow vector field is more complex and the velocity profile is more skewed. For the in vivo case, the outcomes demonstrate more complexity and higher variability in the sign of skewedness inside the stent when compared with the flow in the proximal to the stent.

conclusionsHelical stents make the vector field of the flow more complex and the velocity profile more skewed, both of which are signatures of swirling flow. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these features can benefit patients in terms of patency rates.Clinical ImpactThis study demonstrates that helical stent models alter the blood flow when compared with straight stent models. Particularly, the flow grows more complex and its velocity profile becomes more skewed, both of which hint at the existence of swirling flow inside the helical stent. These observations, alongside with population-based studies that are currently being carried out, may provide the evidence that helical stents have some advantages over straight stents for the patients.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresFemoral ArteryPeripheral Arterial DiseaseRheologyStentsBlood Flow VelocityHumansModels, CardiovascularPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRegional Blood FlowTreatment Outcomeblood flow imagingechoPIVhelical stentshigh-frame-rate ultrasoundultrasound velocimetry

Identifiers

PMID39397375
PMCPMC12972089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.