Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39397313›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2025

Digital phenotyping in bipolar disorder: Using longitudinal Fitbit data and personalized machine learning to predict mood symptomatology.

Jessica M Lipschitz, Sidian Lin, Soroush Saghafian, Chelsea K Pike, Katherine E Burdick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica M LipschitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4085-0507
Sidian LinGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Soroush SaghafianHarvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Chelsea K PikeDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Katherine E BurdickDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Toward optimizing digital mental health interventions: A clinical trial aimed at understanding what drives patient engagement.K23MH120324 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIPSCHITZ, JESSICA MORROW · 2020 to 2024
$960k
Alkermes, Inc.Baszucki Brain Research FundBrain and Behavior Research FoundationHarvard Brain Initiative Bipolar Disorder Seed Grant ProgramHarvard University Middle East Initiative Kuwait Science ProgramNIMH NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS K23 MH120324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) requires prompt response to mood episodes. Preliminary studies suggest that predictions based on passive sensor data from personal digital devices can accurately detect mood episodes (e.g., between routine care appointments), but studies to date do not use methods designed for broad application. This study evaluated whether a novel, personalized machine learning approach, trained entirely on passive Fitbit data, with limited data filtering could accurately detect mood symptomatology in BD patients.

methodsWe analyzed data from 54 adults with BD, who wore Fitbits and completed bi-weekly self-report measures for 9 months. We applied machine learning (ML) models to Fitbit data aggregated over two-week observation windows to detect occurrences of depressive and (hypo)manic symptomatology, which were defined as two-week windows with scores above established clinical cutoffs for the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) and Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM) respectively.

resultsAs hypothesized, among several ML algorithms, Binary Mixed Model (BiMM) forest achieved the highest area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC) in the validation process. In the testing set, the ROC-AUC was 86.0% for depression and 85.2% for (hypo)mania. Using optimized thresholds calculated with Youden's J statistic, predictive accuracy was 80.1% for depression (sensitivity of 71.2% and specificity of 85.6%) and 89.1% for (hypo)mania (sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 90.1%).

conclusionWe achieved sound performance in detecting mood symptomatology in BD patients using methods designed for broad application. Findings expand upon evidence that Fitbit data can produce accurate mood symptomatology predictions. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, this represents the first application of BiMM forest for mood symptomatology prediction. Overall, results move the field a step toward personalized algorithms suitable for the full population of patients, rather than only those with high compliance, access to specialized devices, or willingness to share invasive data.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderdigital phenotypingmachine learningpredictionwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID39397313
PMCPMC13552231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.