Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39397273›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2024

Recurrent tick bites induce high IgG1 antibody responses to α-Gal in sensitized and non-sensitized forestry employees in Luxembourg.

Neera Chakrapani, Kyra Swiontek, Judith M Hübschen, Jörg Fischer, Maria Ruiz-Castell, Francoise Codreanu-Morel, Farah Hannachi, Martine Morisset, Markus Ollert, Annette Kuehn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beefing Up Awareness: Navigating Alpha-Gal Syndrome.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Alpha-Gal Sensitization Dynamics in Individuals After Tick Bites With or Without Erythema Migrans.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Neera ChakrapaniDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6015-2933
Kyra SwiontekDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9185-481X
Judith M HübschenDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-2128
Jörg FischerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maria Ruiz-CastellDepartment of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9741-7491
Francoise Codreanu-MorelThe Immunology-Allergology Unit, Center Hospitalier Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Farah HannachiThe Immunology-Allergology Unit, Center Hospitalier Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Martine MorissetThe Immunology-Allergology Unit, Center Hospitalier Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Markus OllertDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-0103
Annette KuehnDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-2135
Claude P MullerDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Christiane HilgerDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-5442

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FI2226/2-1Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg C17/BM/11656090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is characterized by the presence of specific IgE-antibodies to the carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal). Sensitization to α-Gal has been associated with tick bites and individuals exposed to ticks have an elevated risk of sensitization. The aim of this study was to analyze IgG and IgE antibody responses to α-Gal in a high-risk cohort of forestry employees (FE) in Luxembourg.

methodsQuestionnaires and serum samples of FE from Luxembourg (n = 219) were retrospectively analyzed. α-Gal specific IgE was quantified by ImmunoCAP, α-Gal specific IgG and subclasses IgG

resultsTwenty-one percent of FE was sensitized to α-Gal (sIgE ≥ 0.1 kU

conclusionOur study provides evidence for a continuous stimulation of α-Gal related immune responses by repeated tick bites, translating into highly elevated levels of IgG1 antibodies directed against α-Gal.

Indexed as

alpha‐gal syndromehigh‐risk populationsensitizationspecific IgEα‐Gal IgG

Identifiers

PMID39397273
PMCPMC11471575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.