ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Human Claustrum Connections: Robust In Vivo Detection by DWI-Based Tractography in Two Large Samples.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- New functional insights from the monkey claustrum.National science review · 2026Review
- Multiscale characterization of the human claustrum from histology to MRI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The Human Visual Claustrum Responses to Physical Stimulus Properties and Subjective Content During Movie Viewing.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- The human claustrum supports cognitive networks for externally and internally driven task demands.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- The Role of the Claustrum in Parkinson's Disease and Vascular Parkinsonism: A Matter of Network?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite substantial neuroscience research in the last decade revealing the claustrum's prominent role in mammalian forebrain organization, as evidenced by its extraordinarily widespread connectivity pattern, claustrum studies in humans are rare. This is particularly true for studies focusing on claustrum connections. Two primary reasons may account for this situation: First, the intricate anatomy of the human claustrum located between the external and extreme capsule hinders straightforward and reliable structural delineation. In addition, the few studies that used diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI)-based tractography could not clarify whether in vivo tractography consistently and reliably identifies claustrum connections in humans across different subjects, cohorts, imaging methods, and connectivity metrics. To address these issues, we combined a recently developed deep-learning-based claustrum segmentation tool with DWI-based tractography in two large adult cohorts: 81 healthy young adults from the human connectome project and 81 further healthy young participants from the Bavarian longitudinal study. Tracts between the claustrum and 13 cortical and 9 subcortical regions were reconstructed in each subject using probabilistic tractography. Probabilistic group average maps and different connectivity metrics were generated to assess the claustrum's connectivity profile as well as consistency and replicability of tractography. We found, across individuals, cohorts, DWI-protocols, and measures, consistent and replicable cortical and subcortical ipsi- and contralateral claustrum connections. This result demonstrates robust in vivo tractography of claustrum connections in humans, providing a base for further examinations of claustrum connectivity in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.