ArticleBJU international2025
VI-RADS followed by Photodynamic Transurethral Resection of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer vs White-Light Conventional and Second-resection: the 'CUT-less' Randomised Trial Protocol.
Article in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05962541 (Non-inferiority, Phase IV, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial of Vesical Imaging- Reporting and Data System), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Non-inferiority, Phase IV, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial of Vesical Imaging- Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Followed by Primary Photodynamic Trans-urethral Resection of Bladder Tumours (PDD-TURBT) Versus Conventional White-light TURBT Plus Repeated-TURBT (Re-TURBT) in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers (NMIBCs) Candidate for Second Look and Resection
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Bladder Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Current Status and Future Perspective for Bladder Cancer MR Imaging and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Japan: Challenges and Solutions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA second transurethral resection of bladder tumour (Re-TURBT) is recommended by European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) due to the risk of understaging and/or persistent disease following the primary resection. However, in many cases this may be unnecessary, potentially harmful, and significantly expensive constituting overtreatment. The CUT-less trial aims to combine the preoperative staging accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) and the intraoperative enhanced ability of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) to overcome the primary TURBT pitfalls thus potentially re-defining criteria for Re-TURBT indications. STUDY
designSingle-centre, non-inferiority, phase IV, open-label, randomised controlled trial with 1:1 ratio. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is short-term BC recurrence between the study arms to assess whether patients preoperatively categorised as VI-RADS Score 1 and/or Score 2 (i.e., very-low and low likelihood of MIBC) could safely avoid Re-TURBT by undergoing primary PDD-TURBT. Secondary endpoints include mid- and long-term BC recurrences and progression (i-ii). Also, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes (iii) and health-economic cost-benefit analysis (iv) will be performed. PATIENTS AND
methodsAll patients will undergo preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the bladder with VI-RADS score determination. A total of 327 patients with intermediate-/high-risk NMIBCs, candidate for Re-TURBT according to EAU Guidelines, will be enrolled over a 3-year period. Participants will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either standard of care (SoC), comprising primary white-light (WL) TURBT followed by second WL Re-TURBT; or the Experimental arm, comprising primary PDD-TURBT and omitting Re-TURBT. Both groups will receive adjuvant intravesical therapy and surveillance according to risk-adjusted schedules. Measure of the primary outcome will be the relative proportion of BC recurrences between the SoC and Experimental arms within 4.5 months (i.e., any 'early' recurrence detected at first follow-up cystoscopy). Secondary outcomes measures will be the relative proportion of late BC recurrences and/or BC progression detected after 4.5 months follow-up. Additionally, we will compute the HRQoL variation from NMIBC questionnaires modelled over a patient lifetime horizon and the health-economic analyses including a short-term cost-benefit assessment of incremental costs per Re-TURBT avoided and a longer-term cost-utility per quality-adjusted life year gained using 2-year clinical outcomes to drive a lifetime model across the two arms of treatment.
trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov identifier (ID): NCT05962541; European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) ID: 2023-507307-64-00.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.