Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39397233›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2025

Combining Hypnosis and Virtual Reality: A Qualitative Investigation of User Experience During an Experimental Pain Study.

Éloïse Cardinal, Pierre Augier, Émilie Giguère, Mathieu Landry, Sylvie Lemay, Jade Véronneau, Anne-Sophie Nyssen, Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Pierre Rainville and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Éloïse Cardinal *Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Pierre Augier *Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Émilie GiguèreDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Mathieu LandryMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sylvie LemayFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Jade VéronneauDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Anne-Sophie NyssenLaboratory of Cognitive Ergonomics and Work Intervention, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Marie-Elisabeth FaymonvilleSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA-Consciousness, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Audrey VanhaudenhuyseSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA-Consciousness, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Pierre RainvilleMedical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415, Boulevard de L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Floriane Rousseaux *Medical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415, Boulevard de L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
David Ogez *Medical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415, Boulevard de L'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada. David.ogez@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7441-9678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) and hypnosis (H) are useful pain management tools, but the potential benefit of their combination (VRH) has yet to be studied. This study examines the user experience of VRH, compared to H and VR alone, using interviews following an experimental study examining the effect of the three interventions on pain perception. Following a within-subjects repeated measures experimental design, 16 participants received the three interventions during which they received painful electrical stimuli. Following each intervention, explanatory interviews were conducted to allow participants to elaborate on their user experience. A thematic analysis was conducted on the data collected. Three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) satisfaction: participants mostly had positive feelings toward the three modalities, with the most beneficial effects on relaxation expressed for H. (2) Body perception and attention focus: immersion in the VR and VRH conditions was appreciated. Participants described their perceptions of pain perception during the 3 conditions. (3) Device acceptability: H was the most liked, followed by VRH, and then VR alone. Intention of use was reported following the same order. The data collected highlighted participants' opinions of these different interventions and suggested adjustments for future development of the VRH intervention in pain management.

Indexed as

HypnosisPain ManagementPain PerceptionPatient SatisfactionVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultExperimental painHypnosisQualitative analysisUser experienceVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.