ReviewInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Comparative effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries: a network meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Bariatric Surgery in Acquired Hypothalamic Obesity: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-obesity medications in adults with congenital heart disease: a comprehensive review and expert clinical recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Review
- Global Technical Variations in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Worldwide Survey Among IFSO Members.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Body Composition Changes After Bariatric Surgery or Treatment With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Trends of copper deficiency following one anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- HbA1c Reductions Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy With Proximal Jejunal Bypass: Significant Differences in Diabetic Patients.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is recommended for patients with unhealthy weight. Our study aim to compare and rank different bariatric surgical approaches in reducing weight parameters. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2023. We extracted all outcomes as mean change from the baseline. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval were used as a summary measure. All analysis was conducted with R version 4.2.2 (2022-10-31) and R Studio version 2022.07.2 (2009-2022) (RStudio, Inc.). Included surgeries were: Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD-RYGB), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Laparoscopic Gastric Plication (LGP), Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Sleeve (DJBS), Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB), Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Gastric plication, Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), and Intra-gastric balloon (IGB). Only clinical trials were included, with outcomes focused on weight parameters such as reductions in BMI (kg/m²), weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), fat mass (kg), and excess weight loss (EWL) (%). Our analysis of 67 studies showed that SADI-S was the best surgical technique in decreasing BMI (kg/m2) (MD = -18.06; 95% CI [-25.31; -10.81]) and DS follows in efficacy with a P-score (MD = -18.88; 95% CI [-31.15; -6.62]) however the pooled analysis was heterogeneous (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
39397157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.