ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of treatment outcomes between slow coagulation transscleral cyclophotocoagulation and micropulse transscleral laser treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying Various Audible "Pops" during Cyclophotocoagulation: A Case Report.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Article
- Central subfield thickness changes and factors associated with OCT-confirmed cystoid macular edema after slow-coagulation transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of slow-coagulation cyclophotocoagulation after failed MicroPulse cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Acute Structural Effects of Novel Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation versus Standard Endoscopic and Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Histopathological Changes After Standard and Novel Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Human Cadaveric Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared treatment outcomes of slow coagulation transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (SC-CPC, 65 eyes) and micropulse transscleral laser treatment (MPL, 134 eyes) in patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma. Success was defined as achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 6-21 mmHg with a ≥ 20% reduction from baseline, no reoperation for glaucoma, and no loss of light-perception vision. Visual acuity, number of glaucoma medication, corneal endothelial cell count, aqueous flare values, and complications were analyzed. At 12 months, mean IOP decreased from 32.2 ± 13.4 to 17.9 ± 8.3 mmHg in the SC-CPC group and from 26.4 ± 10.8 to 16.5 ± 6.8 mmHg in the MPL group. No significant changes were observed in visual acuity, medication count, or corneal endothelial cell count. Aqueous flare values increased immediately after the procedure and gradually decreased in both groups, with greater changes at 1 week significantly associated with greater IOP reduction (p < 0.05). Pupillary abnormalities were found in 5 eyes (4.5%) of the MPL group, with no severe complications. The 12-month success rates were 50.1% for SC-CPC and 38.2% for MPL (p = 0.131). Both SC-CPC and MPL effectively controlled IOP, with early postoperative aqueous flare values predicting treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.