ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of three different root canal sealants on human dental pulp stem cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of physicochemical and cytotoxic characteristics of resin-based and bioceramic root canal sealers: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Histopathological evaluation of bone tissue response to endodontic sealers and gutta-percha using an intraosseous implantation model in Wistar rats.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Cytotoxicity of Zinc Oxide withInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cytotoxic effects of three root canal sealers with different bases on human dental pulp stem cells were assessed in this study using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. The cytotoxic effects of three root canal sealers with different bases on human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were assessed in this study using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. The cytotoxicity of the sealers was tested after one, 4, and 7 d. Human dental pulp stem cell proliferation was concluded using an MTT assay. Cells not treated with sealer extract were used as controls. The absorption levels were measured using an Eliza spectrophotometer. P was set at 0.05 when the percentage of cell proliferation was matched between groups and observation times using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).During the second passage (P2), human dental pulp stem cells displayed a single morphological and phenotypic trait, with fibroblast morphology being the most common. There were no appreciable variations between the four groups after a day. There was a notable variation in the average percentage of cell proliferation between the groups after 4 and 7 days. The control group had the highest percentage, followed by the GuttaFlow Bioseal group, the Well Root St group, and the AH-Plus group, which had the lowest percentage. For every sealing group, after one day, the highest mean percentage of cell proliferation was recorded, followed by day four, and after day seven, the lowest mean percentage. The observation periods showed minimal cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow Bioseal, whereas AH-Plus was the most cytotoxic to human dental pulp stem cells. The highest mean percentage of cell proliferation for all sealers was recorded on day one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.