ArticleScientific reports2024
Characterizing cognitive phenotypes and clinical correlates in type 2 diabetes using fuzzy clustering and decision tree analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is frequently seen in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), ranging from mild impairment to dementia. However, our knowledge of the specific profiles and risk factors for these different levels of impairment is limited. In this study involving 152 patients with T2DM, cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test. The Fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm was utilized to group individuals with similar cognitive characteristics. The study evaluated how well clinical parameters could classify characteristics of clusters using the Classification and Regression Trees algorithm. ROC analysis was then used to assess the classification success. Three distinct cognitive clusters were identified. Cluster 1 had the poorest cognitive performance and was characterized by more women, lower education levels, and lower levels of iron, hemoglobin, and creatine. Cluster 3, the amnestic cluster, was distinguished by low TSH levels. The decision tree model highlighted several parameters, including education level, hemoglobin, duration of diabetes mellitus (DM), iron, TSH, gender, family history of diabetes, and microalbumin/creatinine ratio, as significantly affecting the distinction of cognitive clusters. Diabetes-associated cognitive impairment stems from multifaceted pathophysiological mechanisms influenced by complex risk factors, resulting in diverse types of cognitive deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.