ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
The clinical significance of elastic lamina invasion in patients with pStage II colorectal cancer: a notable prognostic indicator.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome colorectal cancers (CRCs) are clinically diagnosed as cT4a with serosal invasion (SI). However, the cT4a is most often underdiagnosed pathologically as pT3 without SI by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining alone. Using Elastica van Gieson (EVG) staining, some pT3 tumors invade the elastic lamina (EL), which extends just below the serosal layer. Recently, EL invasion (ELI) has been described as a poor prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with pStage II CRC. However, its clinicopathological significance remains unclear due to the limited number of studies and poor understanding of ELI.
objectiveThis study investigated the association between the ELI and patient prognosis.
methodsAfter 1982, pathological diagnosis was routinely performed using H&E and EVG staining methods, and long-term follow up was performed until 2016. All clinicopathological features including ELI were prospectively registered into our computer and 569 patients with pStage II CRC were collected from the database. Based on the ELI status, pT3 was divided into three pathological categories: pT3ELI - was defined as pT3a, pT3ELI + as pT3b and unidentified EL (pT3EL -) as pT3u.
resultsUsing H&E staining alone, gross cT4a was most often pathologically underdiagnosed as pT3 (93.8%) and very rarely as pT4a, resulting in a large diagnostic discrepancy. Using EVG staining, 60.7% of the cT4a tumors were diagnosed as pT3b. The 10-year DFS and OS rates were similar for pT3a and pT3u patients. However, the 10-year DFS and OS rates of pT3b patients were significantly lower than those of pT3a patients (75.6% vs. 95.6%, p < 0.0001 and 58.4% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.0024, respectively) but did not differ from those of pT4a patients (70.6%, p = 0.5799 and 52.0%, p = 0.1116, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ELI was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrence and CRC-specific death (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsA better understanding of the ELI allows us to reconsider the diagnostic discrepancy of serosal invasion, i.e., pT3b should be considered pT4a. The ELI-based subclassification of pT3 is expected to be incorporated into the TNM staging system in the future. The ELI is a notable prognostic indicator in patients with pStage II CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.