ArticleBMC plant biology2024
Phylogenomics and plastome evolution of Lithospermeae (Boraginaceae).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Chloroplast Genome Analysis of Anchusa and the Adulterants of HERBA ANCHUSAE.Genes · 2026Article
- Reinstatement ofPhytoKeys · 2026Article
- Plastome phylogenomics of the Korean endemic plant Arisaema thunbergii subsp. geomundoense (Araceae).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of Symphytum officinale.Genetics and molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLithospermeae is the largest tribe within Boraginaceae. The tribe has been the focus of multiple phylogenetic studies over the last 15 years, with most focused on one genus or a few genera. In the present study, we newly sequenced 69 species of Lithospermeae and relatives to analyze the phylogenomic relationships among its members as well as the evolution of the plastid genome.
resultsThe phylogeny of Lithospermeae resolved from the plastid genome and nrDNA cistron is generally congruent with prior studies, but is better resolved and supported. Increasing character sampling across the plastid genome results in gradually more similar trees to that from the entire plastid genome. Overall, plastid genome structure was quite consistent across Lithospermeae. Codon Usage Bias (CUB) analyses demonstrate that across Lithospermeae plastid genomes were rich in AT and poor in GC. Mutation may play a greater role than selection across the plastid genome of Lithospermeae. The present study is the first to highlight the CUB characteristics of Lithospermeae species, which can help elucidate the mechanisms underlying patterns of molecular evolution and improve the expression levels of exogenous genes by codon optimization.
conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Lithospermeae, significantly enhancing our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships and plastid genome evolution within this largest tribe of Boraginaceae. By utilizing an expanded genomic sampling approach, we have achieved increased resolution and support among the evolutionary relationships of the tribe, in line with but improving upon previous studies. The analyses of plastid genome structure revealed consistency across Lithospermeae, with a notable CUB. This study marks the first investigation into the CUB of Lithospermeae species and sets the stage for further research on the molecular evolution of plastid genomes across Boraginaceae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.