Trial reportClinical implant dentistry and related research2025
Maintenance Costs, Time, and Efforts Following Implant Therapy With Fixed Restorations Over an Observation Period of 10 Years: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pre-extractive Versus Postextractive Implant Site Preparation for Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of One-Piece and Two-Piece Dental Implants After 15-17 Years: Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Trial
- Cost Effectiveness of Two Short Implants Versus One Short Implant With a Cantilever in the Posterior Region: 7.5-Year Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Trial
- Multiscale Interface Engineering for Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Substance-Gain Extrusion Technique (SGET) in Combination With BOPT-Technique Description.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Cumulative Error in Digital Workflows for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From fixture to function: Evaluating prosthetic complications in dental implant rehabilitation.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Influence of Aging on the Torque Accuracy of Two Different Spring-Style Implant Torque Wrenches: An in vitro Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
- Amino Silane High Positive Charge Layers: A Stable and Durable Alternative Based on Electrostatic Interactions for Titanium Applications, Combining Antimicrobial and Biological Properties.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- What if implant-based prosthodontics would have a standard screw head?International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- The Future of Dental Implants: A Narrative Review of Trends, Technologies, and Patient Considerations.Cureus · 2025Review
- Novel Esthetic Technique for Restoring Dental Implant Access Holes: A Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Screw Stability of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the costs and efforts of maintenance therapy following implant treatment with fixed restoration over an observation period of 10 years. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis randomized controlled clinical trial included 64 patients who were randomly assigned to receive one of two implant systems (AST or STM) and fixed restoration. Patients were included in a regular maintenance program and were examined at loading, 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10 years. Outcome measures included technical and biological complications, time, efforts, and costs to resolve them.
resultsA total of 97 implants were placed in 64 patients (AST: 54, STM: 43). Patient recall rates at 5 and 10 years were 89% and 67%. In general, technical complications were resolved within one to two appointments (mean = 1.5), and biological complications required a mean of 1.3 appointments. The overall regular maintenance time for the period of 10 years amounted to 77 min per year. Technical complications occurred in 39.5% of the patients, with screw-loosening being the most common one (43.4% of all complications). The most time-consuming technical complication was abutment fracture (94 min ± 68), followed by screw fracture (84 min ± 38). The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis on the patient level was 30.2%, and it was 9.3% for peri-implantitis. The average annual maintenance costs amounted to 9% of the initial cost of the implant treatment over the period of 10 years.
conclusionsAdditional regular maintenance costs and costs due to the treatment of potential complications have to be taken into consideration when placing dental implants. The majority of technical complications could be resolved within one appointment, whereas the time needed to treat biological complications varied between one and three appointments for peri-implantitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.