Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39396815›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2024

Virtual reality as a promising method of pain relief in patients with venous leg ulcers.

Kinga Spyrka, Ewa Rojczyk, Jakub Brela, Aleksander Sieroń, Marek Kucharzewski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kinga SpyrkaWladyslaw Bieganski Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.
Ewa RojczykWladyslaw Bieganski Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-5542
Jakub BrelaWladyslaw Bieganski Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.
Aleksander SierońWladyslaw Bieganski Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.
Marek KucharzewskiWladyslaw Bieganski Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain in patients suffering from hard-to-heal wounds is a serious problem that hinders the healing process and affects their quality of life. Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly being used for pain relief. The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of VR during mechanical cleansing of venous leg ulcers would result in a reduction in patients' pain. Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group included patients who used VR goggles during wound cleansing, and the control group included patients who did not use such equipment during wound cleansing. The Oculus Quest 2 VR Goggles were used in the experiment. After wound cleaning, the patient assessed the intensity of his pain on a numerical pain rating scale from 0 to 10 points. The difference between the intensity of pain during wound cleansing in patients from the experimental and control group turned out to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). It was on average 1.13 ± 0.68 points in the experimental group, and in the case of people from the control group, it was 4.73 ± 1.2 points. To conclude, the use of VR in patients with venous leg ulcers reduces pain during wound cleansing.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementVaricose UlcerAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementVirtual RealityWound Healingdebridementleg ulcerpainvaricose ulcervirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39396815
PMCPMC11471300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.