ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024
Use of electron microscopy to determine presence of coal dust in a neighborhood bordering an open-air coal terminal in Curtis Bay, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- KOH activation of carbon electrodes for enhanced capacitive dechlorination: Performance and mechanisms.PloS one · 2026Article
- High-Throughput Microfluidic Technologies for Rapidly Screening Pollutant-Induced Cell Health Effects.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2025Article
- Relation of wind direction and coal terminal activity patterns with air pollution burden in a community bordering a coal export terminal, Curtis Bay, Maryland, USA.Air quality, atmosphere, & health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite decreasing US consumption, over 90 million metric tons of coal were exported by the US in 2023, requiring significant infrastructure for transport, handling, and storage of coal at export terminals. Residents in Curtis Bay, Baltimore, Maryland, USA live at the fenceline of an open-air coal terminal and have, for decades, reported rapid accumulation of black dust at their homes. Community-level exposure to coal dust originating from coal handling and storage terminals has remained largely unexplored.
objectivesTo investigate community-identified concerns and use a community-driven approach to determine the presence/absence of coal dust on Curtis Bay surfaces.
methodsPassive settled dust samples were collected from two residential areas, 345 m and 1235 m from the coal terminal, using conductive carbon tape. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) of standard reference coal material and positive control material from the coal terminal in Curtis Bay were used to optimize the morphological and elemental classification criteria for coal dust. A manual SEM-EDX protocol was developed to identify coal particles in settled dust collected on conductive carbon tape in community settings.
resultsSEM-EDX analysis confirmed presence of coal dust sampled at both residential locations. Estimated coal dust particle loading at the proximal and distal site were 13.2 and 3.4 coal particles/mm DISCUSSION: These findings are consistent with longstanding community concerns and lived experiences regarding the presence of coal dust in Curtis Bay, which neighbors a major open-air coal terminal. This approach has potential for other communities neighboring coal terminals to assess similar concerns with residential coal dust exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.