ArticleLancet (London, England)2024
Reductions in recurrence in women with early breast cancer entering clinical trials between 1990 and 2009: a pooled analysis of 155 746 women in 151 trials.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multidisciplinary Practical Guidance for Implementing Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Patients with HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Guideline
- Trial
- Omitting Regional Nodal Irradiation after Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Trial
- Prognostic relation of body mass index on extended aromatase inhibition treatment in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of the SOLE trial.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2025Trial
- Breast cancer recurrence: socioeconomic position and general practice involvement - a nationwide cohort study in Denmark.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning clinicogenomic model to improve prognostic stratification in ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- [Anthracycline use in breast cancer based on our current knowledge].Magyar onkologia · 2026Review
- Article
- Risk of Recurrence in Patients with HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer: A Podcast.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Second ipsilateral locoregional recurrence in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for prognostic prediction in young women with triple-negative invasive ductal breast cancer: a Boruta-SHAP integrated approach.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Monitoring of circulating tumor DNA allows early detection of disease relapse in patients with operable breast cancer.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Programmable nanomicelles rewire myeloid immunity for durable control of primary and metastatic breast cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Distant recurrence and margin involvement in invasive breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Estimating the number of people living with metastatic breast cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health data.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- The 19th St. Gallen international breast cancer conference 'primary therapy of patients with early breast cancer. Evidence, controversies, consensus': key moments and breakthroughs.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation of PREDICT tool v2.2 in patients with early-stage breast cancer enrolled in the GIM and MIG trials.ESMO open · 2026Article
- From detection to action: ctDNA-MRD surveillance and translational strategies in early breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor cell phenotypic conversion as a predictor of late recurrence in breast cancer: a prospective feasibility study using the GenoCTC platform.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDistant recurrence in women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer persists at a constant rate for more than 20 years after diagnosis, with little equivalent data for oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Using the database of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) we investigated rates of distant breast-cancer recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative tumours and trends in outcomes over time.
methodsIn this pooled analysis of randomised controlled trial data, patients in the EBCTCG database of more than 650 000 women in trials of treatment for early-stage breast cancer were screened for eligibility. Women were eligible if they were enrolled between 1990 and 2009 and newly diagnosed with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and scheduled for at least 5 years of endocrine therapy, or oestrogen receptor-negative disease, and if they were younger than 75 years at diagnosis, had a tumour diameter of 50 mm or less, and fewer than ten positive axillary lymph nodes, and no evidence of distant metastases at entry. Trial of neoadjuvant therapy, or those in which adjuvant therapy was unclear, and women with oestrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive disease, or those for whom outcome or baseline data were missing were excluded. The primary outcome was time to first distant recurrence as defined by each trial, ignoring any locoregional recurrence or contralateral breast cancer. 10-year risks of distant recurrence by period of diagnosis were compared using Cox regression adjusted for patient and tumour characteristics, trial, and assigned treatment.
findingsOf the 652 258 women with early breast cancer in the EBCTCG database on Jan 17, 2023, patient-level data were available from 151 randomised trials that included 155 746 women. Rates of distant tumour recurrence improved similarly in women with oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative tumours. 80·5% of the improvement for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 89·8% of the improvement for eostrogen receptor-negative disease was explained by changes in patient and tumour characteristics and improved treatments, but remained significant (p<0·0001). More recently diagnosed patients were more likely to have node-negative disease. 10-year distant recurrence risks during 1990-99 versus 2000-09 were as follows: for node-negative disease, 10·1% versus 7·3% for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 18·3% versus 11·9% for oestrogen receptor-negative disease; for disease with one to three positive nodes, 19·9% versus 14·7% for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 31·9% versus 22·1% for oestrogen receptor-negative disease; and for disease with four to nine positive nodes, 39·6% versus 28·5% for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 47·8% versus 36·5% for oestrogen receptor-negative disease. After adjustment for therapy, rates were reduced by 25% (oestrogen receptor-positive disease) and 19% (oestrogen receptor-negative disease) after 2000 versus the 1990s, with similar improvements observed in oestrogen receptor-positive disease beyond 5 years.
interpretationMost of the improvement in trial outcomes is explained by a greater proportion of women with lower-risk disease entering trials and improved adjuvant treatment. After adjustment, women diagnosed since 2000 have about a fifth lower rate of distant recurrence than the 1990s. Long-term risks of distant recurrence for oestrogen receptor-positive disease remain, but are about a tenth lower now than in our previous report.
fundingCancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.