Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39396239›Full record

ArticleCriminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH2024

Psychopathy checklist-youth version scores and recurring victimisation by an intimate partner in a justice-involved sample: A comparison of young men and women using longitudinal data.

Michelle N Harris, Leah E Daigle, Dennis Reidy, Travis Chafin, Nick D Thomson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle N HarrisCriminology and Criminal Justice Program, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-6894
Leah E DaigleDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Dennis ReidySchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Travis ChafinDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nick D ThomsonDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople involved in the criminal justice system are at increased risk of recurring intimate partner violent (IPV) victimisation. Experience of trauma is linked to a variety of negative outcomes, including repeated experiences, so it is important to identify factors that may distinguish non-victims, single-event victims and recurring victims at an early stage as this could hold potential for intervention efforts. Research studies have identified individual-level risk factors for IPV victimisation but have not investigated psychopathy traits or sex differences.

aimsTo examine sex differences in psychopathy scores and later IPV victimisation.

methodsUsing the Pathways to Desistance study, a longitudinal study of 1354 adjudicated adolescent offenders, relationships between psychopathy checklist-youth version (PCL-YV) scores measured during the baseline wave, independent/control variables in wave 6 and self-reported IPV victimisation in wave 7 were explored using multinomial regression models.

resultsAmong justice-involved young adults (average age 19), PCL-YV scores differentiated between non-victims, single-event victims and recurring victims. Higher total scores and higher ratings on the antisocial behaviours facet of psychopathy significantly increased the relative risk of recurring victimisation by an intimate partner overall, and specifically of emotional or physical intimate partner violence. For the young women but not the young men, a higher scoring on the interpersonal manipulation facet of psychopathy specifically increased the relative risk of being a recurring victim of any intimate partner violence.

conclusionsSex-specific differences in relationships between high PVL-YV scores and recurring IPV victimisation can be used to screen for risk of repeated trauma for justice-involved young adults, which may change a trajectory of continued involvement in the criminal justice system to a trajectory of resilience and recovery.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentAdultAntisocial Personality DisorderCriminal LawCriminalsFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsSexual PartnersYoung Adultadjudicated youthIPV victimisationpsychopathysex differencesvictimisation

Identifiers

PMID39396239
PMCPMC11617798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.