Trial reportMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2024
Evaluation of a new mouthwash formulated with Chlorhexidine and Cymenol after a scaling and root planing treatment in grade I and II periodontal patients.
Trial report in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antiseptics Prescription for the Prevention and Treatment of Periodontal Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periodontal disease is a multifactorial pathology whose treatment protocol is becoming increasingly standardized, relying, among others, on adjuvant therapies. This study aims to determine the efficacy of a new chlorhexidine compound compared with the gold standard 0.12% chlorhexidine during periodontal maintenance of a patient with periodontitis grade I or II after scaling and root planing treatment. Material and Methods: A parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trial with two arms: (A) treatment with 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash; (B) treatment with new chlorhexidine mouthwash containing O-Cymen-5-Ol. The patient was examined: (D0) initial examination, (D7) clinical examination one week after treatment, (D14) clinical examination two weeks after treatment and (D28) clinical examination three weeks after treatment. They are collecting the following data: Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding index (BoP), pocket depth (PS), and attachment loss (CAL). Results: After a follow-up of 43 patients, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any of the times or for any of the parameters evaluated, meeting the predefined criteria of non-inferiority. Conclusions: The new chlorhexidine mouthwash proved to be non-inferior to 0.12% chlorhexidine in terms of efficacy during short-term periodontal maintenance after scaling and root planing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.