ArticleScientific reports2024
Revealing disease subtypes and heterogeneity in common variable immunodeficiency through transcriptomic analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Proteomic and Transcriptomic Profiles in T-cells and Monocytes in Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency: an Exploratory Study.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics identification of immune-related biomarkers predicting tofacitinib response in rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency characterized by reduced levels of specific immunoglobulins, resulting in frequent infections, autoimmune disorders, increased cancer risk, and diminished antibody production despite an adequate B cell count. With its clinical manifestations being highly variable, the classification of CVID, including the widely recognized Freiburg classification, is primarily based on clinical symptoms and genetic variations. Our study aims to refine the classification of CVID by analyzing transcriptomics data to identify distinct disease subtypes. We utilized the GSE51405 dataset, examining transcriptomic profiles from 30 CVID patients without complications. Employing a combination of clustering techniques-KMeans, hierarchical agglomerative clustering, spectral clustering, and Gaussian Mixture models-and differential gene expression analysis with R's limma package, we integrated molecular findings with demographic data (age and gender) through correlation analysis and identified common genes among clusters. Three distinct clusters of CVID patients were identified using KMeans, Agglomerative Clustering, and Gaussian Mixture Models, highlighting the disease's heterogeneity. Differential expression analysis unveiled 31 genes with variable expression levels across these clusters. Notably, nine genes (EIF5A, RPL21, ANP32A, DTX3L, NCF2, CDC42EP3, CHP1, FOLR3, and DEFA4) exhibited consistent differential expression across all clusters, independent of demographic factors. The study recommends categorizing patients based on the four genes, NCF2, CHP1, FOLR3, and DEFA4-as they may assist in prognostic prediction. Transcriptomic analysis of common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients identified three distinct clusters based on gene expression, independent of age and gender. Nine differentially expressed genes were identified across these clusters, suggesting potential biomarkers for CVID subtype classification. These findings highlight the genetic heterogeneity of CVID and provide novel insights into disease classification and potential personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.