Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39395845›Full record

ArticleSurgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery2025

Racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: an 8-year analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program data.

Qais AbuHasan, Payton M Miller, Wendy S Li, Charles P Burney, Tarik K Yuce, Dimitrios Stefanidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qais AbuHasanDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Payton M MillerDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Wendy S LiDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Charles P BurneyDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Tarik K YuceDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Dimitrios StefanidisDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: dimstefa@iu.edu.

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at Indiana UniversityK12TR004415 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAMIR KUMAR GUPTA · 2023 to 2026
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic surgery utilization has been increasing across surgical specialties; however, racial disparities in patient access to care and outcomes have been reported.

objectivesIn this study, we examined racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery over an 8-year period.

settingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) centers of excellence across the United States.

methodsThe MBSAQIP database was used to identify adult patients who underwent robotic bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2022. Patients were stratified according to race and ethnicity into non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black or African American (AA), Indigenous, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Multivariable analyses were used to assess predictors of robotic surgery use, odds of minor and major complications, prolonged length of stay (prolonged length of stay (pLOS): ≥3 days), readmissions, reoperations, and mortality within 30 days.

resultsOut of 1,288,359 patients included, robotic surgery was utilized in 196,314 patients (15.2%), with a mean age of 44 ± 12 years and 80.6% females. Rates of robotic surgery increased to 30% by 2022. Compared to White patients, Black/AA patients were more likely to undergo robotic surgery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21-1.24, P < .001). The safety of robotic bariatric surgery improved for both White and Black patients with decreased odds of major complications, readmissions, reoperations, and pLOS over the study period. However, Black/AA patients were more likely to experience minor and major complications, readmissions and have pLOS compared with White patients in 2022 (aOR:1.26, 95% CI:1.19-1.34, P < .001; aOR:1.22, 95% CI:1.06-1.41, P = .006; aOR:1.44, 95% CI:1.28-1.62, P < .001; aOR:2.26, 95% CI:2.06-2.47, P < .001, respectively).

conclusionThe utilization of robotic bariatric surgery has increased significantly over the past 8 years with continued improvements in its safety profile. While Black/AA patients have improved access to robotic surgery, their clinical outcomes continue to be worse than those of White patients. Efforts to address racial disparities in bariatric surgery outcomes must remain a priority to achieve health equity.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryHealthcare DisparitiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresAccreditationAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsQuality ImprovementRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryPatient safetyRacial disparitiesRobotic surgeryUtilization

Identifiers

PMID39395845
PMCPMC11820883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.