ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2024
Implementation of a Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Heart Failure Prediction Tool-Guided Management Pathway.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redesign of Implantable Cardiac Device Workflow Improves Remote Monitoring Timeliness and Heart Failure Alert Metrics.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Veterans health administration national cardiac device surveillance program: Structured, centralized remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices to improve quality of care.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) monitor physiologic variables that could identify subacute heart failure (HF) decompensation and impending HF hospitalization. One such algorithm uses measurements from the previous 30 days of CIED remote monitoring data to predict low-, medium-, or high-probability of HF hospitalization in the next 30 days. We sought to understand how to prospectively implement the use of such algorithms in routine HF care. From January 18, 2024 to April 19, 2024, HF risk categories were predicted from scheduled remote transmissions every 30 days and from unscheduled transmissions for all patients at 2 distinct cardiology clinics. Clinicians contacted and assessed patients at high risk regarding symptoms and then provided an empiric 3-day diuretic intervention (initiation or dose augmentation), adjusted guideline-directed medical therapy, or performed other clinical action as appropriate. Among 358 patients with 1,140 remote transmissions, 72 (20%) had ≥1 transmission categorized as high-risk. The mean patient age was 72.8 years, 346 (97%) were male, and 221 (62%) had a pre-existing diagnosis of HF. Of these 72 patients, 67 (93%) were successfully contacted, 34 (51%) had no HF symptoms, 24 (36%) had mild to moderate symptoms, and 2 (3%) had severe symptoms. A total of 46 patients (69%) had clinical action taken, including 28 (42%) with a diuretic intervention and 12 (18%) with guideline-directed medical therapy augmented. In this implementation study, clinicians contacted and assessed nearly all patients at high risk for HF decompensation based on CIED remote monitoring data and intervened in more than 2/3s. A randomized clinical trial is needed to determine whether this algorithm and subsequent intervention improves clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.