Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39395177›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Testing Similarity of Parametric Competing Risks Models for Identifying Potentially Similar Pathways in Healthcare.

Kathrin Möllenhoff, Nadine Binder, Holger Dette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathrin MöllenhoffInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7861-3892
Nadine BinderInstitute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-4154
Holger DetteDepartment of Mathematics, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1597-499552394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of similar patient pathways is a crucial task in healthcare analytics. A flexible tool to address this issue are parametric competing risks models, where transition intensities may be specified by a variety of parametric distributions, thus in particular being possibly time-dependent. We assess the similarity between two such models by examining the transitions between different health states. This research introduces a method to measure the maximum differences in transition intensities over time, leading to the development of a test procedure for assessing similarity. We propose a parametric bootstrap approach for this purpose and provide a proof to confirm the validity of this procedure. The performance of our proposed method is evaluated through a simulation study, considering a range of sample sizes, differing amounts of censoring, and various thresholds for similarity. Finally, we demonstrate the practical application of our approach with a case study from urological clinical routine practice, which inspired this research.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, StatisticalCritical PathwaysDelivery of Health CareHumansRisk Assessmentbootstrapmultistate modelsparametric competing risks modelsroutine clinical datasimilaritysmall data

Identifiers

PMID39395177
PMCPMC11586916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.