Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39395091›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025

Antioxidant Properties of Postbiotics: An Overview on the Analysis and Evaluation Methods.

Negin Hosseinzadeh, Abolfazl Asqardokht-Aliabadi, Vahideh Sarabi-Aghdam, Neda Hashemi, Parisa Rahimi Dogahi, Narges Sarraf-Ov, Aziz Homayouni-Rad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bridging In Vitro Functionality and Genomic Insights inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Negin HosseinzadehStudent Research Committee, Department of Food Science and Technology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Hosseinzadeh@tbzmed.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0002-0740-7060
Abolfazl Asqardokht-AliabadiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-1881
Vahideh Sarabi-AghdamDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition & Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-7928
Neda HashemiUniversity of Applied Science & Technology, Center of Pardisan Hospitality & Tourism Management, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-9608
Parisa Rahimi DogahiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0009-0008-1564-6046
Narges Sarraf-OvStudent Research Committee, Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.ORCID 0009-0006-4662-0813
Aziz Homayouni-RadDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition & Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Homayounia@tbzmed.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0001-6766-0108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antioxidants found naturally in foods have a significant effect on preventing several human diseases. However, the use of synthetic antioxidants in studies has raised concerns about their potential link to liver disease and cancer. The findings show that postbiotics have the potential to act as a suitable alternative to chemical antioxidants in the food and pharmaceutical sectors. Postbiotics are bioactive compounds generated by probiotic bacteria as they ferment prebiotic fibers in the gut. These compounds can also be produced from a variety of substrates, including non-prebiotic carbohydrates such as starches and sugars, as well as proteins and organic acids, all of which probiotics utilize during the fermentation process. These are known for their antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer properties that help improve human health. Various methodologies have been suggested to assess the antioxidant characteristics of postbiotics. While there are several techniques to evaluate the antioxidant properties of foods and their bioactive compounds, the absence of a convenient and uncomplicated method is remarkable. However, cell-based assays have become increasingly important as an intermediate method that bridges the gap between chemical experiments and in vivo research due to the limitations of in vitro and in vivo assays. This review highlights the necessity of transitioning towards more biologically relevant cell-based assays to effectively evaluate the antioxidant activity of postbiotics. These experiments are crucial for assessing the biological efficacy of dietary antioxidants. This review focuses on the latest applications of the Caco-2 cell line in the assessment of cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) and bioavailability. Understanding the impact of processing processes on the biological properties of postbiotic antioxidants can facilitate the development of new food and pharmaceutical products.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsProbioticsAnimalsFermentationHumansAntioxidantsAntioxidant activityBioavailabilityCell-based assaysCellular antioxidant activity (CAA)PostbioticsProbiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.