ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Nomogram based on virtual hyperemic pullback pressure gradients for predicting the suboptimal post-PCI QFR outcome after stent implantation.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Non-inferiority of Angiography-derived Physiology Guidance Versus Usual Care in an All-comers PCI Population Treated With Unrestricted Use of the Healing-Targeted Supreme (HT Supreme) Drug-eluting Stent and P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After 1-month of Dual-antiplatelet Therapy
A Multicenter, Single Arm, Open-label Trial of Prasugrel Monotherapy After PCI With the SYNERGY® Stent in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome or Non-ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrowing evidence shows an association between higher post-PCI quantitative flow ratios (QFR) and improved clinical prognosis, however, no models are available to predict suboptimal QFRs (< 0.91) after angiographically successful PCI. This study aims to establish a prediction nomogram for this domain.
methodsThis study included 450 vessels derived from 421 consecutive patients enrolled in the PIONEER IV trial, which were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a training (N = 225) and internal validation (N = 225) set, with external validation performed in 97 vessels from 95 consecutive patients enrolled in the ASET Japan trial. LASSO regression was used for optimal feature selection, and multivariate logistic regression was subsequently utilized to construct the nomogram. The performance of the nomograms was assessed and validated by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curves.
resultsThe nomogram was constructed incorporating a novel metric, quantitative flow ratio derived pullback pressure gradient (QFR-PPG), alongside four conventional parameters: left anterior descending artery disease, pre-procedural QFR, reference vessel diameter, and percent diameter stenosis. AUCs of the nomogram were 0.866 (95%CI:0.818-0.914), 0.784 (95% CI:0.722-0.847), and 0.781 (95% CI:0.682-0.879) in the training, internal validation and external validation sets, respectively. Bias-corrected curves revealed a strong consistency between actual observations and prediction.
conclusionThe risk of a suboptimal post-PCI QFR in patients after angiographically successful PCI can be effectively predicted using a nomogram incorporating five variables available pre-PCI, with its performance and clinical predictive value confirming its utility in helping clinicians with decision-making and planning revascularization.
trial registrationRegistered on clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04923191 and NCT05117866).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39395074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.