Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39395040›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2024

Enhancing Spectrometer Performance with Unsupervised Machine Learning.

Benjamin D Harding, Ziling Hu, Ashley Hiett, Frank Delaglio, Katherine A Henzler-Wildman, Chad M Rienstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Backbone and sidechainBiomolecular NMR assignments · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin D HardingBiophysics Graduate Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Ziling HuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Ashley HiettBiophysics Graduate Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Frank DelaglioInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Katherine A Henzler-WildmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Chad M RienstraBiophysics Graduate Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-5596

Funding

Technologies for Solid-State NMR Data CollectionP41GM136463 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTLER, WILLIAM MILO · 2021 to 2025
$6.4M
Toolkit for High-Resolution Structure and Dynamics of Functional LipidsR01GM123455 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MORRISSEY, JAMES H., RIENSTRA, CHAD M · 2016 to 2020
$5.0M
Predoctoral Training in Molecular BiophysicsT32GM130550 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SENES, ALESSANDRO · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM136463NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123455NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM130550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state NMR spectroscopy (SSNMR) is a powerful technique to probe structural and dynamic properties of biomolecules at an atomic level. Modern SSNMR methods employ multidimensional pulse sequences requiring data collection over a period of days to weeks. Variations in signal intensity or frequency due to environmental fluctuation introduce artifacts into the spectra. Therefore, it is critical to actively monitor instrumentation subject to fluctuations. Here, we demonstrate a method rooted in the unsupervised machine learning algorithm principal component analysis (PCA) to evaluate the impact of environmental parameters that affect sensitivity, resolution and peak positions (chemical shifts) in multidimensional SSNMR protein spectra. PCA loading spectra illustrate the unique features associated with each drifting parameter, while the PCA scores quantify the magnitude of parameter drift. This is demonstrated both for double (HC) and triple resonance (HCN) experiments. Furthermore, we apply this methodology to identify magnetic field

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisUnsupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular

Identifiers

PMID39395040
PMCPMC11550512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.