Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394996›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model for F-53B in Pregnant Mice and Its Extrapolation to Humans.

Jing Zhang, Shen-Pan Li, Qing-Qing Li, Yun-Ting Zhang, Guang-Hui Dong, Alexa Canchola, Xiaowen Zeng, Wei-Chun Chou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current approaches and advances in placental toxicology.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing ZhangJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shen-Pan LiJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Qing-Qing LiAcacia Lab for Implementation Science, Institute for Global Health, Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Yun-Ting ZhangJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Guang-Hui DongJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2578-3369
Alexa CancholaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8285-4795
Xiaowen ZengJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3918-1841
Wei-Chun ChouDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3355-6921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonic acid (F-53B), a commonly utilized alternative for perfluorooctane sulfonate, was detected in pregnant women and cord blood recently. However, the lack of detailed toxicokinetic information poses a significant challenge in assessing the human risk assessment for F-53B exposure. Our study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for pregnant mice, based on toxicokinetic experiments, and extrapolating it to humans. Pregnant mice were administered 80 μg/kg F-53B orally and intravenously on gestational day 13. F-53B concentrations in biological samples were analyzed via ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results showed the highest F-53B accumulation in the brain, followed by the placenta, amniotic fluid, and liver in fetal mice. These toxicokinetic data were applied to F-53B PBPK model development and evaluation, and Monte Carlo simulations were used to characterize the variability and uncertainty in the human population. Most of the predictive values were within a 2-fold range of experimental data (>72%) and had a coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsAnimalsFemaleHumansMiceModels, BiologicalPregnancyFluorocarbonsF-53BMonte Carlo (MC) simulationperfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling

Identifiers

PMID39394996
PMCPMC11500426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.