Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394945›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

FibroScan-AST score for diagnosing fibrotic MASH: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Konstantinos Malandris, Dimitrios Arampidis, Maria Mainou, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, Thomas Karagiannis, Tarek Nayfeh, Aris Liakos, Emmanouil Sinakos, Apostolos Tsapas, Eleni Bekiari

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Konstantinos MalandrisClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-2401
Dimitrios ArampidisClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maria MainouClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos PapadopoulosSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Thomas KaragiannisClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-0574
Tarek NayfehEvidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9052-5537
Aris LiakosClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3261-2979
Emmanouil SinakosFourth Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Apostolos TsapasClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-4072
Eleni BekiariClinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-3835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimFollowing the approval of the first agent for the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), identification of patients with fibrotic MASH (MASH with NAS ≥ 4 and fibrosis stage ≥ 2) is crucial. We assessed the performance of FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (AST) score (FAST) for ruling in/out fibrotic MASH.

methodsWe searched Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and gray literature sources up to January 11, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed the accuracy of FAST score for the detection of fibrotic MASH using biopsy as the reference standard at previously reported thresholds (FAST ≥ 0.67 for ruling-in and ≤ 0.35 for ruling-out fibrotic MASH). We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for FAST thresholds alongside 95% confidence intervals following bivariate random- effects models. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

resultsWe included 16 studies with 8838 participants. A FAST score ≥ 0.67 yielded a pooled specificity of 0.87 (0.82-0.90) while a FAST score ≤ 0.35 yielded a summary sensitivity of 0.88 (0.83-0.91). At a prevalence of 30%, the positive predictive value for ruling-in fibrotic MASH was 60% while the negative predictive value for ruling-out the target condition was 91%. AST levels, cirrhosis prevalence, and number of pathologists reviewing biopsies were sources of heterogeneity among studies. The certainty of evidence was low to very low.

conclusionsFAST score can be used as a triage test for ruling out fibrotic MASH. Nevertheless, its low positive predictive value necessitates sequential testing for ruling-in fibrotic MASH.

Indexed as

Aspartate AminotransferasesElasticity Imaging TechniquesLiver CirrhosisFatty LiverHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAspartate AminotransferasesDiagnostic accuracyFAST scoreMASHMeta‐analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39394945
PMCPMC11660209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.