Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394789›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2024

Growing the peer workforce in rural mental health and social and emotional well-being services: A scoping review of the literature.

Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig, Melissa A Lindeman, Penny Watson, Xianliang Liu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bróna Nic Giolla EaspaigCharles Darwin Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia.
Melissa A LindemanThe Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Penny WatsonThe Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Queensland, Australia.
Xianliang LiuCharles Darwin Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3296-5339

Funding

Northern Territory Primary Health Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGrowing the mental health peer workforce holds promise for rural communities, but we currently lack an understanding of the guidance available to support the development, implementation and sustainability of this workforce in rural settings.

objectiveStudy aims are to: (1) determine the extent and nature of the literature that provides guidance for growing the peer workforce in rural mental health services; and (2) identify and explore any guidance relevant to rural peer work services dedicated to First Nations communities, including those promoting social and emotional well-being within this body of literature.

designA scoping review method was employed to identify relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2013 and 2022 across PsychInfo, Medline, Embase and CINAHL, Scopus and Informit HealthInfoNet databases, as well as targeted organisation websites and Google Advanced Search.

findingsA total of 26 unique studies/projects were included from the US, UK, Canada and Australia with public mental health, non-government/for purpose and private sector service settings represented in the literature. Grey literature, such as reports of evaluations and frameworks, formed the majority of included texts. While there is a lesser volume of rurally focused literature relative to the general peer work literature, this is a rich body of knowledge, which includes guidance concerning services dedicated to First Nations communities. Via synthesis critical considerations were identified for the development, implementation and sustainability of peer work in rural mental health services across six domains: 'Working with community members and stakeholders', 'Organisational culture and governance', Working with others and in teams, Professional expertise and experience, Being part of and working in the community and 'Local mental health services capacity'. DISCUSSION: While there are considerations relevant across a range of settings, the domains of: 'working with community members and stakeholders', 'being part of and working in the community' and 'local mental health services capacity', capture additional, distinct and nuanced challenges and opportunities for growing the peer work in rural services.

conclusionThe literature offers insights valuable for service planning, policy development and the allocation of resources to support rural peer workforce growth.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPeer GroupRural Health ServicesAustraliaCanadaHumansRural PopulationWorkforcelived experiencepeer workregional, rural and remoteworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID39394789
PMCPMC11640200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.