Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394772›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2024

Oral Microbiota Development in the First 60 Months: A Longitudinal Study.

K Yama, S Morishima, K Tsutsumi, R Jo, Y Aita, T Inokuchi, T Okuda, D Watai, K Ohara, M Maruyama and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. First characterization of the oral microbiota of capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) in Brazil: insights into one health risks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

K YamaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-4029
S MorishimaThe Lion Foundation for Dental Health, Taito-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
K TsutsumiResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-2915
R JoResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Y AitaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
T InokuchiResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
T OkudaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
D WataiResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
K OharaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
M MaruyamaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
T ChikazawaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
T IwamotoResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Y KakizawaResearch and Development Headquarters, Lion Corporation, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
T OnikiThe Lion Foundation for Dental Health, Taito-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood is considered crucial in the establishment of future oral microbiota. However, the precise period of oral microbiota development remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the progression of oral microbiota formation in children. We longitudinally investigated the salivary microbiota of 54 children across 13 time points from 1 wk to 60 mo (5 y) old and their parents at 2 time points as a representative sample of the adult microbiota. Using next-generation sequencing, we obtained 10,000 gene sequences of the 16s rRNA V1-V2 region for each sample. The detection rate in children of 110 operational taxonomic units commonly detected in more than 85% of mothers and fathers, defined as the main constituent bacteria, was 25% at 1 wk old, increased to 80% between 6 and 18 mo old, and reached approximately 90% by 36 mo old. Early main constituent bacteria detected at 1 wk old were limited to

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMouthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalivaAdultBacteriaChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16Schildhighly prevalent oral bacteriamicrobial colonizationmicrobial consortiumoral bacteria

Identifiers

PMID39394772
PMCPMC11562288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.