Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394724›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Application of a digital quality measure for cancer diagnosis in Epic Cosmos.

Andrew J Zimolzak, Sundas P Khan, Hardeep Singh, Jessica A Davila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inpatient mortality following hip fracture in the United States: an updated analysis of over one million cases.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of a digital quality measure for cancer diagnosis in Epic Cosmos.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  7. Advancing a learning health system through biomedical and health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J ZimolzakCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0973-5639
Sundas P KhanCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-8974
Jessica A DavilaCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS028595AHRQ HHS R18 HS029347AHRQ HHS R18HS029347Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety CIN 13-413Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation GBMF 8838Health Services Research and DevelopmentHouston Veterans AdministrationVA National Center for Patient SafetyVA National Center for Patient Safety and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R18HS029347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMissed and delayed cancer diagnoses are common, harmful, and often preventable. We previously validated a digital quality measure (dQM) of emergency presentation (EP) of lung cancer in 2 US health systems. This study aimed to apply the dQM to a new national electronic health record (EHR) database and examine demographic associations. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe applied the dQM (emergency encounter followed by new lung cancer diagnosis within 30 days) to Epic Cosmos, a deidentified database covering 184 million US patients. We examined dQM associations with sociodemographic factors.

resultsThe overall EP rate was 19.6%. EP rate was higher in Black vs White patients (24% vs 19%, P < .001) and patients with younger age, higher social vulnerability, lower-income ZIP code, and self-reported transport difficulties. DISCUSSION: We successfully applied a dQM based on cancer EP to the largest US EHR database.

conclusionThis dQM could be a marker for sociodemographic vulnerabilities in cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQuality Indicators, Health CareSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statesdigital quality measureelectronic health recordpatient safetysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39394724
PMCPMC11648705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.