ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Minimally Invasive Combined Medial and Lateral Approach for Treating Displaced Scapular Body and Neck Fractures.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reverse Versus Modified Judet Approach for Extra-Articular Glenoid Neck and Scapular Body Fractures: A Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparing Single and Dual Plating in Displaced Scapular Body Fractures: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Functional Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional open surgery for displaced scapular body and neck fractures often results in significant trauma and complications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach compared with the traditional Judet approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 patients (22 men, 14 women; mean age 45.6 years) with displaced scapular body and neck fractures treated between May 2016 and May 2022. Nineteen patients underwent the minimally invasive approach, while 17 received the traditional Judet approach. Primary outcomes included surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, time to postoperative pain relief (VAS score ≤3), and Constant-Murley shoulder score at 12 months. Statistical analysis was done using the t test and chi-square test. RESULTS The minimally invasive group had shorter incision lengths (mean difference: 10.0 cm; 95% CI: 8.1-11.9; P<0.001) and lower blood loss (mean difference: 129.4 mL; 95% CI: 119.0-139.8; P<0.001). They also experienced faster pain relief (mean difference: 3.0 days; 95% CI: 2.5-3.5; P<0.001) and higher Constant-Murley scores (mean difference: 7.4 points; 95% CI: 4.9-9.9; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in operative duration or fracture healing time. CONCLUSIONS The combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach offers superior outcomes in reducing incision length, blood loss, complications, and pain, with enhanced shoulder function, making it a safe and effective alternative to the traditional Judet approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.