Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394608›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2024

Favourable dentoalveolar changes after lower premolar extractions for Class III camouflage with completely customized lingual appliances.

Lea C Thiem, Per Rank, Jonas Q Schmid, Yann Janssens, Lara Bettenhäuser-Hartung, Dirk Wiechmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lea C ThiemPrivate Practice, Bad Essen, Germany. lea.thiem@kfo-badessen.de.
Per RankPrivate Practice, Svendborg, Denmark.
Jonas Q SchmidDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Yann JanssensPrivate Practice, Bad Essen, Germany.
Lara Bettenhäuser-HartungPrivate Practice, Bad Essen, Germany.
Dirk WiechmannPrivate Practice, Bad Essen, Germany. wiechmann@lingualsystems.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the investigation was to evaluate if the inclination of the lower anterior teeth can be controlled reliably after lower premolar extraction for Class III camouflage treatment with completely customized lingual appliances (CCLAs). Treatment outcome was tested against the null hypothesis that lower premolar extractions for non-surgical camouflage treatment of a Class III malocclusion will lead to further compensation by retroclining mandibular incisors during CCLA treatment.

methodsThis retrospective study included 25 patients (f/m 12/13; mean age 20.7 years, SD 9.5 years) with uni- or bilateral Class III molar relationship and a Wits value of ≤ -2 mm. In all consecutively debonded patients, lower premolars were extracted to correct the sagittal relationship with a non-surgical camouflage approach. Lateral head films prior to (T1) and at the end of lingual orthodontic treatment (T2) were used to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects. A paired t-test with alpha = 5% was used to define differences between the endpoints. The linear correlation between the inclination of the mandibular incisors at T1 and the achieved correction was measured with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). A Schuirmann's TOST equivalence test was used to check if the final lower incisor inclination was within the defined norms.

resultsThe null hypothesis was rejected as the mean lower incisor inclination was improved by 1.8° despite lower premolar extractions (T1: 86.8°/ T2: 88.6°). There was a strong correlation (-0.75) between the lower incisor inclination at T1 and the achieved correction indicating a controlled correction towards the norm regardless of the initial incisor position. At T2, the interincisal angle as well as the lower incisor inclination were within the norm.

conclusionLower premolar extractions for non-surgical camouflage treatment of a Class III malocclusion will not lead to undesired retroclining of mandibular incisors during CCLA treatment even in severe cases.

Indexed as

BicuspidMalocclusion, Angle Class IIITooth ExtractionAdolescentAdultCephalometryFemaleHumansMaleMandibleOrthodontic Appliance DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultClass III camouflageCompletely customized lingual applianceLingual orthodonticsLower incisor inclinationTorque control

Identifiers

PMID39394608
PMCPMC11468468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.