Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394569›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

The effect of phosphorus, irradiance and competitor identity on the relative performance of invasive Chromolaena odorata.

Yu-Long Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yu-Long ZhengCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan, 666303, China. zhengyl@xtbg.org.cn.

Funding

14th Five-Year Plan of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, E3ZKFF3B01, E3ZKFF9B01National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF1302402National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResource competition is an important factor affecting the invasion success of alien plants, and environmental factors influence the competition outcomes between invasive and native plants. In this study, we explore the competitive pattern between invasive Chromolaena odorata and two native plant species under different phosphorus and irradiance levels.

resultsThe final biomass of each plant was regulated by both morphological and physiological traits. Invasive C. odorata did not always perform better than both native plants, and the competitive pattern between C. odorata and native plants was dependent on native competitor identity and environmental conditions. With competition, invasive C. odorata showed higher biomass (over 60%) than native Xanthium sibiricum under all treatments, but only showed higher biomass (about 20%) than native Eupatorium lindleyanum in normal irradiance treatments. The effect of phosphorus on competition depended on the irradiance level. Under normal irradiance, phosphorus addition increased (almost 10 times) the competitive index of invasive C. odorata; however, under shade irradiance, phosphorus addition decreased (40%) the competitive index of C. odorata.

conclusionThese results suggest that phosphorus, irradiance and native plant competitor together influence the relative performance of invasive C. odorata. In shade environment, selecting E. lindleyanum as competitor and increasing phosphorus level is an effective method for controlling the invasion of C. odorata.

Indexed as

ChromolaenaIntroduced SpeciesPhosphorusBiomassEupatoriumLightXanthiumPhosphorusChromolaena odorataCompetitor identityInvasive plantsIrradiancePhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID39394569
PMCPMC11470702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.