Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394565›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Predicting buprenorphine adherence among patients with opioid use disorder in primary care settings.

Stephanie A Hooker, Colleen Starkey, Gavin Bart, Rebecca C Rossom, Sheryl Kane, Anthony W Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie A HookerHealthPartners Institute, Research and Evaluation Division, 8170 33rd Ave S, Mail stop 21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, USA. stephanie.a.hooker@healthpartners.com.
Colleen StarkeyHealthPartners Institute, Research and Evaluation Division, 8170 33rd Ave S, Mail stop 21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, USA.
Gavin BartHennepin Healthcare, 701 Park Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
Rebecca C RossomHealthPartners Institute, Research and Evaluation Division, 8170 33rd Ave S, Mail stop 21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, USA.
Sheryl KaneHealthPartners Institute, Research and Evaluation Division, 8170 33rd Ave S, Mail stop 21112R, Minneapolis, MN, 55425, USA.
Anthony W OlsonEssentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN, 55805, USA.

Funding

Suicide Prediction and Prevention for People at Risk for Opioid Use DisorderUG1DA040316 · NIDA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GAVIN BART · 2015 to 2026
$42.2M
National Institute on Drug Abuse's Clinical Trials Network UG1DA040316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) and reduce risk for overdose and death. Buprenorphine can be prescribed in outpatient primary care settings to treat OUD; however, prior research suggests adherence to buprenorphine in these settings can be low. The purpose of this study was to identify the rates of and factors associated with buprenorphine adherence among patients with OUD in the first six months after a new start of buprenorphine.

methodsData were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) from a large integrated health system in the upper Midwest. Patients with OUD (N = 345; Mean age = 37.6 years, SD 13.2; 61.7% male; 78% White) with a new start of buprenorphine between March 2019 and July 2021 were included in the analysis. Buprenorphine adherence in the first six months was defined using medication orders; the proportion of days covered (PDC) with a standard cut-point of 80% was used to classify patients as adherent or non-adherent. Demographic (e.g., age, sex, race and ethnicity, geographic location), service (e.g., encounters, buprenorphine formulations and dosage) and clinical (e.g., diagnoses, urine toxicology screens) characteristics were examined as factors that could be related to adherence. Analyses included logistic regression with adherence group as a binary outcome.

resultsLess than half of patients were classified as adherent to buprenorphine (44%). Adjusting for other factors, male sex (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20, 0.57, p < .001) and having an unexpected positive for opioids on urine toxicology (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.83, p < .014) were associated with lower likelihood of adherence to buprenorphine, whereas being a former smoker (compared to a current smoker; OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.02, 3.27, p = .014) was associated with greater likelihood of being adherent to buprenorphine.

conclusionsThese results suggest that buprenorphine adherence in primary care settings may be low, yet male sex and smoking status are associated with adherence rates. Future research is needed to identify the mechanisms through which these factors are associated with adherence.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug MonitoringOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphineNarcotic AntagonistsAdherenceMedications for opioid Use DisorderOutpatient treatmentSubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID39394565
PMCPMC11468455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.