ArticlePharmaceutical research2024
Fabrication of Uniform Melatonin Microparticles Potentially for Nasal Delivery: A Comparison of Spray Drying and Spray Freeze Drying.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spray-freeze-drying aprepitant with hydroxypropyl cellulose increases nasal bioavailability.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Combined extraction and spray-freeze-drying of Cannabis sativa Flos provides stable lyophilizate particles of cannabinoids.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInsomnia is a major health concern, and melatonin (MLT) is key for initiating sleep. Delivering MLT nasally can enhance brain bioavailability by targeting the olfactory region. This study aimed to fabricate MLT embedded microparticles for nasal delivery.
methodsMLT-cyclodextrin (CD) derivatives complex microparticles (MCCMPs) were fabricated by spray drying and spray freeze drying MLT and CD derivative solutions. Phase solubility and
resultsSodium sulphobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD) exhibited the best complexation ability with MLT, with the indole structure of MLT included in its cavity. Spray dried MCCMPs showed dense structure with high density, while the spray freeze dried counterpart showed the brittle and porous structure with low density. Despite the porous structure may promote the release rate of spray freeze dried samples, the high hydrophilicity of the CD derivative overshadows this advantage. Samples prepared by spray drying not only exhibited rapid release rates but also could deposit more effectively in the olfactory region, as they avoid breakage due to their higher mechanical strength. The optimal sample showed ~ 86.70% of the MLT released at 20 min and ~ 10.57% of the deposition fraction in the olfactory region.
conclusionsThis work compares MCCMPs fabricated by spray drying and spray freeze drying, providing the optimal formulation and process combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39394484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.