Trial reportScientific reports2024
Popliteal plexus block compared with tibial nerve block on rehabilitation goals following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of popliteal plexus block for opioid sparing and pain management after lower extremity surgery: a meta-analysis.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Popliteal plexus block: does opioid sparing translate into better recovery?The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Popliteal Plexus Block as a Potential Alternative to IPACK Block in Total-Knee Arthroplasty: Anatomical Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Ergonomic Advantages.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Optimal Analgesic Volume for Popliteal Plexus Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Blinded RCT Protocol.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Fascial plane blocks for postoperative pain management after fast-track total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This trial examined the effectiveness of the popliteal plexus block (PPB) and tibial nerve block (TNB) for early rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We allocated 136 participants to receive PPB or TNB with 0.25% levobupivacaine 10 mL in a randomized, double-masked manner. The primary outcome was achieving rehabilitation goals with a non-inferiority 9-hour margin, including adequate pain relief, knee flexion angles over 90 degrees, and enabling ambulatory rehabilitation. The time to reach rehabilitation goals showed non-inferiority with 49.7 ± 10.5 h for TNB and 47.4 ± 9.7 h for PPB, whose mean difference (PPB - TNB) was - 2.3 h (95% CI -5.8 to 1.2 h; P < 0.001). PPB showed higher dorsal and plantar percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (dorsal, PPB 87.7% ± 11.4% vs. TNB 74.0% ± 16.5%: P < 0.001; plantar, PPB 90.9% ± 10.3% vs. TNB 72.1% ± 16.0%; P < 0.001) at six hours after nerve block. No significant differences between the two groups emerged in pain scores, knee range of motion, additional analgesic requirements, success in the straight leg raise, and adverse events. PPB exhibited non-inferiority to TNB in achieving postoperative rehabilitation goals and had superiority in preserving foot motor strength after TKA. (200).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.