ArticleScientific reports2024
The potential of federated learning for self-configuring medical object detection in heterogeneous data distributions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Robust federated learning for UAV object detection: a joint self-distillation and drift compensation approach.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-driven brain tumor classification and segmentation using non-contrast MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Privacy-preserving federated learning for collaborative medical data mining in multi-institutional settings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical Object Detection (MOD) is a clinically relevant image processing method that locates structures of interest in radiological image data at object-level using bounding boxes. High-performing MOD models necessitate large datasets accurately reflecting the feature distribution of the corresponding problem domain. However, strict privacy regulations protecting patient data often hinder data consolidation, negatively affecting the performance and generalization of MOD models. Federated Learning (FL) offers a solution by enabling model training while the data remain at its original source institution. While existing FL solutions for medical image classification and segmentation demonstrate promising performance, FL for MOD remains largely unexplored. Motivated by this lack of technical solutions, we present an open-source, self-configuring and task-agnostic federated MOD framework. It integrates the FL framework Flower with nnDetection, a state-of-the-art MOD framework and provides several FL aggregation strategies. Furthermore, we evaluate model performance by creating simulated Independent Identically Distributed (IID) and non-IID scenarios, utilizing the publicly available datasets. Additionally, a detailed analysis of the distributions and characteristics of these datasets offers insights into how they can impact performance. Our framework's implementation demonstrates the feasibility of federated self-configuring MOD in non-IID scenarios and facilitates the development of MOD models trained on large distributed databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.