Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394388›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Foraging distance distributions reveal how honeybee waggle dance recruitment varies with landscape.

Joseph Palmer, Ash E Samuelson, Richard J Gill, Ellouise Leadbeater, Vincent A A Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Seasonal dynamics of the gut microbiota inFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph PalmerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Ash E SamuelsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Richard J GillDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, London, UK.
Ellouise LeadbeaterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4029-7254
Vincent A A JansenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. vincent.jansen@rhul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6518-2090

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M011178/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies use a unique collective foraging system, the waggle dance, to communicate and process the location of resources. Here, we present a means to quantify the effect of recruitment on colony forager allocation across the landscape by simply observing the waggle dance on the dancefloor. We show first, through a theoretical model, that recruitment leaves a characteristic imprint on the distance distribution of foraging sites that a colony visits, which varies according to the proportion of trips driven by individual search. Next, we fit this model to the real-world empirical distance distribution of forage sites visited by 20 honeybee colonies in urban and rural landscapes across South East England, obtained via dance decoding. We show that there is considerable variation in the use of dancing information in colony foraging, particularly in agri-rural landscapes. In our dataset, reliance on dancing increases as arable land gives way to built-up areas, suggesting that dancing may have the greatest impact on colony foraging in the complex and heterogeneous landscapes of forage-rich urban areas. Our model provides a tool to assess the relevance of this extraordinary behaviour across modern anthropogenic landscape types.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimal CommunicationAnimalsBeesEngland

Identifiers

PMID39394388
PMCPMC11470012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.