Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394375›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Amplification-free detection of Ascochyta blight in chickpea using a simple molecular beacon assay.

Kazbek Dyussembayev, Victor Akpe, Talgat Yechshzhanov, Matthew J Cheesman, Tak H Kim, Ian E Cock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kazbek DyussembayevSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Victor AkpeSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Talgat YechshzhanovPedagogical Institute, Astana International University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Matthew J CheesmanMenzies Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Tak H KimSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Ian E CockSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia. I.Cock@griffith.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascochyta blight is a major biotic stress that limits chickpea production globally. Fungicide application remains one of the effective control measures for the endemic spread. Due to the serious threat that synthetic fungicides pose to crop quality, early diagnosis of the pathogen is imperative. Whilst there have previously been several conventional lab-based diagnostic methods developed for early detection of Ascochyta rabiei, they require long assay times, specialised equipment and facilities, and trained personnel to process the samples. To overcome this challenge, a rapid amplification-free detection assay using a molecular beacon probe was developed. The method consists of a simple assembly assay that accurately detects pathogen within 30 min. The developed assay is species-specific and has a similar sensitivity level as conventional amplification-based methods. Although it is still a lab-based technique, considering the simplicity of the assay, it has a great potential to be developed further as a reliable in-field diagnostic device for early detection and quantification of fungal pathogen spores.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCicerPlant DiseasesDNA, FungalSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID39394375
PMCPMC11470000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.