ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhancing convergence speed with feature enforcing physics-informed neural networks using boundary conditions as prior knowledge.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed neural networks with hybrid Kolmogorov-Arnold network and augmented Lagrangian function for solving partial differential equations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MethPriorGCN: a deep learning tool for inferring DNA methylation prior knowledge and guiding personalized medicine.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Study of intelligent home environment system based on big data and improved k-means algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduces an accelerated training approach for Vanilla Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that addresses three factors affecting the loss function: the initial weight state of the neural network, the ratio of domain to boundary points, and the loss weighting factor. The proposed method involves two phases. In the initial phase, a unique loss function is created using a subset of boundary conditions and partial differential equation terms. Furthermore, we introduce preprocessing procedures that aim to decrease the variance during initialization and choose domain points according to the initial weight state of various neural networks. The second phase resembles Vanilla-PINN training, but a portion of the random weights are substituted with weights from the first phase. This implies that the neural network's structure is designed to prioritize the boundary conditions, subsequently affecting the overall convergence. The study evaluates the method using three benchmarks: two-dimensional flow over a cylinder, an inverse problem of inlet velocity determination, and the Burger equation. Incorporating weights generated in the first training phase neutralizes imbalance effects. Notably, the proposed approach outperforms Vanilla-PINN in terms of speed, convergence likelihood and eliminates the need for hyperparameter tuning to balance the loss function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.