ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2024
Acoustic black hole effect enhanced micro-manipulator.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On-demand rotational manipulation of microparticles and zebrafish larvae via orthogonally phased BAW acoustofluidics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microparticle manipulation is a critical concern across various fields including microfabrication, flexible electronics and tissue engineering. Acoustic-activated sharp structures have been designed as simple and flexible tools to manipulate microparticles with their good compatibility, fast response, and broad tunability. However, there still lacks rational acoustic-structure design for effective energy concentration at the acoustic-activated sharp structures for microparticle manipulation. Here, we present the acoustic black hole (ABH) effect as enhancement for the acoustic micro-manipulator. It provides great reliability, simplicity and ease of use, supporting custom design of high-throughput patterning modes. Moreover, compared to commonly used configurations, such as cylindrical or conical microneedles, those microneedles with ABH profile exhibit superior acoustic energy focusing at the tip and induce stronger acoustofluidic effects. The average acoustic flow velocity induced by the ABH microneedle is 154 times greater than that of the conical one and 45 times greater than that of the cylindrical microneedle. Besides, the average acoustic radiation force (ARF) produced by the ABH microneedle against acrylic microparticles is about 319 times greater than that of the cylindrical one and 16 times greater than that of the conical one. These results indicate that ABH design significantly enhances microparticle manipulation. We demonstrate this concept with ABH effect enhanced microparticle manipulation and study the parameters influencing its performance including operating frequency, operating voltage and particle diameter. Furthermore, considering the flexibility of this system, we employ it for various patterning and high-throughput microparticle manipulation. This work paves the way for controllable microparticle manipulation, holding great potential for applications in microfabrication and biomedicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.