ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024
Decoding privacy concerns: the role of perceived risk and benefits in personal health data disclosure.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond functional utility: ethical stewardship as a driver of digital healthcare platform adoption in low-resource settings.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Influencing factors of individuals' willingness to share public health data in big data-driven healthcare: an empirical study based on China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Decoding perceived risks in online healthcare services: a safety-trust model based on grounded theory.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Unveiling the shadows: obstacles, consequences, and challenges of information opacity in healthcare systems.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2025Review
- Correction: Decoding privacy concerns: the role of perceived risk and benefits in personal health data disclosure.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Smarter rules for digital health: How the digital omnibus can simplify without sacrificing patient rights.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersonal health data is crucial for effective medical care, personalized treatment, and health monitoring. It enables accurate diagnosis, efficient treatment plans, and informed healthcare decisions. Personal health data should be protected to ensure patient privacy, prevent misuse or unauthorized access, and maintain trust in healthcare systems, thereby safeguarding individuals' sensitive information from potential harm or exploitation. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether perceived risk and perceived benefits have mediating roles in the relationships among individuals' personal health information disclosure behaviour, perceived control, and privacy concerns.
methodThe population of the study consisted of individuals living in the provinces of Izmir, Konya and Adana. The sample of the study consisted of individuals who were reached through a convenience sampling method. The scales for privacy concerns, perceived control, perceived risk, perceived benefits and information disclosure behaviour were used in the study. Cronbach's alpha and the AVE were calculated, and a confirmatory factor analysis was performed. A path analysis was performed using the structural equation model to test the hypotheses.
resultsThe analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between individuals' personal health data disclosure behaviour and their privacy concerns. However, perceived risk and perceived benefit did not mediate this relationship. Additionally, a significant positive relationship was found between individuals' behaviour of disclosing their perceived control and personal health data, with perceived risk and benefits playing a mediating role in this relationship.
conclusionThe study concluded that as individuals' concerns about sharing personal health data increase, they are less likely to share these data. It was also found that perceived risk and perceived benefit mediate this relationship. Additionally, higher perceived risk intensifies privacy concerns, further discouraging data sharing, while perceived benefits can mitigate these concerns, promoting greater willingness to disclose health information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.