Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39394140›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

Team-based learning in health professions education: an umbrella review.

Maryam Alizadeh, Rasoul Masoomi, Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad, Dean Parmelee, Rusul Jasim Khalaf, Ali Norouzi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07364994 (Effectiveness of a Team Based Learning Intervention on Evidence-Based Practice Competence Among Nursing Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07364994 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Team Based Learning Intervention on Evidence-Based Practice Competence Among Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled131ConditionsNursing Education in Evidence-Based Practice, Active Learning Methods and Life-skills Education, Evidence Based Nursing, Evidence Based Programs in SchoolsArmsEducational Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam AlizadehDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Education Development Center, Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-7424
Rasoul MasoomiIndependent Researcher, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-6062
Mahboobeh Khabaz MafinejadDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Education Development Center, Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-4172
Dean ParmeleeMedical Education, Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4538-3143
Rusul Jasim KhalafCollege of Medicine, University of Al-Ameed, Karbala, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4427-1648
Ali NorouziMedical Education Research Center, Education Development Center (EDC) and Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. ali_norozy@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-9441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam-Based Learning (TBL) has garnered considerable attention in education research. To consolidate the existing evidence, we conducted an umbrella review with four objectives:

methodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology was followed: [1] Search strategy and literature search [2] Screening and Study Selection [3] Assessment of methodological quality [4] Data collection, and [5] Data summary. We utilized Endnote, Excel, and MAXQDA for efficient project management and analyzing data.

resultsAnalyzing twenty-three reviews spanning from 2013 to 2024, we found a peak in TBL research in 2022 including more than 312 unique primary studies involving more than 63,987 participants. Notably, the United States and China accounted for over 61% of the total primary articles focused on students from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and dentistry. Evidence supports the superiority of TBL in enhancing cognitive outcomes. However, findings related to retention are mixed. Insufficient evidence exists to draw robust conclusions when comparing TBL with other active learning methods. TBL demonstrates favorable outcomes in terms of clinical performance and engagement. Non-technical skills show mixed results. Notably, TBL positively impacts self-study, learning ability, decision-making, and emotional intelligence. Faculty experiences reveal an initial increase in workload, but generally hold positive attitude. Faculty development remain limited in duration and scope. Freshmen, academically weaker students, undergraduates, Chinese female students, and nursing students appear to benefit most from TBL. Team formation and size are the most frequently studied elements.

conclusionTBL holds promise for improving learning outcomes, but ongoing investigation is essential to maximize its impact in diverse educational contexts. This umbrella review underscores the need for further research in specific areas i.e. effective pre-class learning methods and faculty workload.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesHealth OccupationsProblem-Based LearningHumansHealth professions educationTeam based learningUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID39394140
PMCPMC11468256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.